x
African Health Sciences
[contact-form-7 id="2459" title="Sidebar Form"]

  • 256(41)530021
  • info@africanhealthsciences.org
African Health Sciences
  • info@africanhealthsciences.org
  • Give Feedback
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Staff
  • Focus & Scope
  • For Authors
  • More Links
    • About The Journal
    • Latest Articles
    • Journal Archives
    • Our Events
    • Faq’s
  • Contact Us
Logo

Contact Info

  • P. O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda
  • +256(41)530021
  • info@africanhealthsciences.org
  • ISSN 1680-6905
  • <!--
  • -->

03Sep2018

Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with the iVue-100 optical coherence tomographer

by admin,  0 Comments

Nishanee Rampersad, Rekha Hansraj

Discipline of Optometry School of Health Sciences,College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu- Natal, Durban, SouthAfrica.

Emails:

hansrajr@ukzn.ac.za

rampersadn@ukzn.ac.za

Abstract

Background: Accurate and repeatable measurements of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness are important in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma and other disorders.

Objective: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of the iVue-100 optical coherence tomographer (OCT).

Methods: The thickness of the RNFL was measured for 50 healthy participants using the iVue-100 OCT.  Although both eyes per participant were measured, only right eyes were analysed here.  Repeatability and reproducibility of the iVue-100 OCT were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CoV), paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: Good intra-observer repeatability was obtained as indicated by the ICC of observer 1 (range:  0.941 – 0.976) and observer 2 (range:  0.829 – 0.953) as well by the CoV of observer 1 (range:  0.098 – 0.137) and observer 2 (0.091 – 0.132).  In terms of inter-observer reproducibility, significant differences (p< 0.05) in mean measurements between the observers were noted for the average RNFL readings and in the superior and inferior quadrants as assessed with paired t-tests.  Even though significant inter-session differences were found for the average RNFL thickness and the superior quadrant (p = 0.003 and p = 0.013, respectively), excellent ICCs were obtained for inter-session reproducibility (range: 0.914 – 0.979).

Conclusion: The iVue-100 OCT demonstrated good repeatability and reproducibility for RNFL thickness measurements.

Keywords:  Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, optical coherence tomography, repeatability, reproducibility, iVue-100 OCT.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i2.15

Cite as: Rampersad N, Hansraj R. Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with the iVue-100 optical coherence tomographer. Afri Health Sci. 2018;18(2): 304-312. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i2.15

Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurements   with the iVue-100 optical coherence tomographer.PDF    

Related posts:

Turkish University seniors’ knowledge of and opinions on fertility and expectations of having childr...

Diagnostic utility of, and influence of tobacco usage and genetic predisposition on, immunoglobulin ...

Antenatal dexamethasone effect on Doppler blood flow velocity in women at risk for preterm birth: pr...

Recent Posts

  • Editor’s choice: Tackling infectious diseases, NCDs and sexual reproductivehealth issues as we enter our 24th year of remarkable growth
  • Preconception and contraceptive care for women living with HIV/AIDSattending antiretroviral treatment clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria
  • Effects of SNPs on TNF-α and IL-10 cytokine expression in TB and HIVpatients in the Capricorn district, Limpopo Province, South Africa
  • Prevalence of Schistosomiasis in a neglected community, South western Nigeria at two points in time, spaced three years apart
  • Review of Leishmaniasis in the Middle East and North Africa

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • April 2024
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Categories

  • 2001 Issues
  • 2002 Issues
  • 2003 Issues
  • 2004 Issues
  • 2005 Issues
  • 2006 Issues
  • 2007 Issues
  • 2008 Issues
  • 2009 Issues
  • 2010 Issues
  • 2011 Issues
  • 2012 Issues
  • 2013 Issues
  • 2014 Issues
  • 2015 Issues
  • 2016 Issues
  • 2017 Issues
  • 2018 Issues
  • 2019 Issues
  • 2024 Issues
  • Articles
  • December issue
  • December Release
  • June Issue
  • June Release
  • March Issue
  • March Issue
  • March Release
  • News
  • number / volume 2
  • number /volume 1
  • number /volume 1
  • number /volume 1 2008
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2 special Issue
  • number 2 special Issue 2
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number/ volume 3 2008
  • number/ volume 4 2008
  • number/volume 1
  • number/volume 1
  • number/volume 2
  • number/volume 2
  • number/volume 2 2008
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 4
  • number/volume1
  • September Issue
  • September Release
  • Special Edition
  • special Issue
  • Uncategorized
  • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
  • volume 1
  • volume 1
  • volume 1
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume1

Categories

  • 2001 Issues
  • 2002 Issues
  • 2003 Issues
  • 2004 Issues
  • 2005 Issues
  • 2006 Issues
  • 2007 Issues
  • 2008 Issues
  • 2009 Issues
  • 2010 Issues
  • 2011 Issues
  • 2012 Issues
  • 2013 Issues
  • 2014 Issues
  • 2015 Issues
  • 2016 Issues
  • 2017 Issues
  • 2018 Issues
  • 2019 Issues
  • 2024 Issues
  • Articles
  • December issue
  • December Release
  • June Issue
  • June Release
  • March Issue
  • March Issue
  • March Release
  • News
  • number / volume 2
  • number /volume 1
  • number /volume 1
  • number /volume 1 2008
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2 special Issue
  • number 2 special Issue 2
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number/ volume 3 2008
  • number/ volume 4 2008
  • number/volume 1
  • number/volume 1
  • number/volume 2
  • number/volume 2
  • number/volume 2 2008
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 4
  • number/volume1
  • September Issue
  • September Release
  • Special Edition
  • special Issue
  • Uncategorized
  • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
  • volume 1
  • volume 1
  • volume 1
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume1

Archives

  • April 2024
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Tags

Achives Latest News


ISSN 1680-6905

  • P. O. Box 7072 ,Kampala, Uganda
  • Call Us: 256(41)530021
  • info@africanhealthsciences.org

Latest Activities

Usefull Link

  • About AHS
  • Services
  • Focus & Scope
  • Our Articles
  • Contact Us

Subscribe

For research updates from African Health Sciences, sign up now!

[contact-form-7 id="1620" title="Subscribe"]

African Health Sciences © All Right Reserved