x
African Health Sciences

    Book Now

    • 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    African Health Sciences
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • Give Feedback
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Staff
    • Focus & Scope
    • For Authors
    • More Links
      • About The Journal
      • Latest Articles
      • Journal Archives
      • Our Events
      • Faq’s
    • Contact Us
    Logo

    Contact Info

    • P. O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda
    • +256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • ISSN 1680-6905
    • <!--
    • -->

    03Oct2017

    Validity of common ultrasound methods

    by admin,  0 Comments

    Validity of common ultrasound methods of fetal weight estimation in late pregnancy among women in Kwale, Niger Delta region, Nigeria.

    CU Eze, KI Egwuanumku, KK Agwuna, L Odidi, K Ochie, IU Nwadike

    Abstract

    Background: Accuracy of some ultrasound equations used in our locality for fetal weight estimation is doubtful.

    Objective: To assess the accuracy of common ultrasound equations used for fetal weight estimation.

    Subjects and Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted on selected Nigerian obstetric population at Central Hospital, Kwale between March, 2009 and January, 2011. Sonography was performed on 412 women with advanced singleton cyesis and measurements of BPD, HC, AC, and FL were obtained and figured into 12 common ultrasound equations for the estimation of fetal weight. The actual birth weight at delivery was recorded.

    Results: The highest intraclass correlation coefficient was generated by the Hadlock 5 and Hsieh 2 equations. The least mean absolute percent error was obtained with Hsieh 2 equation, followed by Woo 3, and Hadlock 5. These equations also had the least percentage error and the least range of limits of agreement in the same order with no significant difference between their mean fetal weight estimates and that of the actual birth weight (p > 0.05). All twelve equations had strong positive correlation with the actual birth weight with Nzeh 2 equation the least.

    Conclusion: Hsieh 2 equation has the best accuracy in fetal weight estimation studied.

    Key Words: Validation; Fetal Weight; Sonography; Advanced Cyesis; Nigerian Population

     

    Related posts:

    Prevalence of cholelithiasis among persons

    Problem based learning

    Prevalence and immediate outcome of candida colonized preterm

    Recent Posts

    • Editor’s choice: Tackling infectious diseases, NCDs and sexual reproductivehealth issues as we enter our 24th year of remarkable growth
    • Preconception and contraceptive care for women living with HIV/AIDSattending antiretroviral treatment clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria
    • Effects of SNPs on TNF-α and IL-10 cytokine expression in TB and HIVpatients in the Capricorn district, Limpopo Province, South Africa
    • Prevalence of Schistosomiasis in a neglected community, South western Nigeria at two points in time, spaced three years apart
    • Review of Leishmaniasis in the Middle East and North Africa

    Recent Comments

    No comments to show.

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Tags

    Achives Latest News


    ISSN 1680-6905

    • P. O. Box 7072 ,Kampala, Uganda
    • Call Us: 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org

    Latest Activities

    Usefull Link

    • About AHS
    • Services
    • Focus & Scope
    • Our Articles
    • Contact Us

    Subscribe

    For research updates from African Health Sciences, sign up now!

      African Health Sciences © All Right Reserved