x
African Health Sciences
[contact-form-7 id="2459" title="Sidebar Form"]

  • 256(41)530021
  • info@africanhealthsciences.org
African Health Sciences
  • info@africanhealthsciences.org
  • Give Feedback
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Staff
  • Focus & Scope
  • For Authors
  • More Links
    • About The Journal
    • Latest Articles
    • Journal Archives
    • Our Events
    • Faq’s
  • Contact Us
Logo

Contact Info

  • P. O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda
  • +256(41)530021
  • info@africanhealthsciences.org
  • ISSN 1680-6905
  • <!--
  • -->

01Sep2018

Fibroadenoma of the breast in a South African population -a pilot study of the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspirate cytology and breast ultrasonography

by admin,  0 Comments

Sumana Pillay1, Shalen Cheddie2, Yoshan Moodley3

  1. University of KwaZulu-Natal College of Health Sciences, Department of Surgery.
  2. Madadeni Hospital.
  3. University of Kwazulu-Natal, Discipline of Anaesthetics and Critical Care.

Abstract

Background: The triple assessment of clinical breast exam (CBE), fine needle aspirate cytology (FNAC) and breast ultrasonography (US) is used in many settings for the diagnosis of fibroadenoma (FA).  The diagnostic accuracy of FNAC and US for FA in South African (SA) women with palpable breast masses (PBM) is unknown.

Objective:  To report the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC/US for FA in SA women with PBM.

Methods:  We conducted a retrospective pilot diagnostic study of 91 women who presented with PBM to a SA regional academic hospital.  Data for CBE, US, unguided FNAC, and open biopsies was collected from study participant medical records and analyzed using diagnostic accuracy tables.

Results:  A total of 57/91 (62.6%) study participants had uninterpretable FNAC results.  No study participants had uninterpretable US results.  The overall diagnostic accuracy of FNAC for FA was 36.3% (95% Confidence Interval – CI: 27.1-46.5%).  The overall diagnostic accuracy of US for FA was 83.5% (95% CI: 74.6-89.8%).

Conclusion: The yield of interpretable test results for FNAC was poor in our study.  The diagnostic accuracy of US for FA appears to be superior to that of FNAC.  Omission of FNAC from the triple assessment in our setting should be considered.  .

Keywords: Fibroadenoma, diagnosis, breast ultrasonography, fine needle aspirate cytology.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i2.11

Cite as: Pillay S, Cheddie S, Moodley Y. Fibroadenoma of the breast in a South African population -a pilot study of the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspirate cytology and breast ultrasonography. Afri Health Sci. 2018;18(2): 273-280. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i2.11

 

 Fibroadenoma of the breast in a South African population -a pilot study of the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspirate cytology and breast ultrasonography.PDF   

Related posts:

The association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Northern Tanzania: a ...

Association of hyperuricemia with metabolic syndrome among university workers: sex and occupational...

Fibrinolytic proteins of normal pregnancy and pre-eclamptic patients in North West Nigeria

Recent Posts

  • Editor’s choice: Tackling infectious diseases, NCDs and sexual reproductivehealth issues as we enter our 24th year of remarkable growth
  • Preconception and contraceptive care for women living with HIV/AIDSattending antiretroviral treatment clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria
  • Effects of SNPs on TNF-α and IL-10 cytokine expression in TB and HIVpatients in the Capricorn district, Limpopo Province, South Africa
  • Prevalence of Schistosomiasis in a neglected community, South western Nigeria at two points in time, spaced three years apart
  • Review of Leishmaniasis in the Middle East and North Africa

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • April 2024
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Categories

  • 2001 Issues
  • 2002 Issues
  • 2003 Issues
  • 2004 Issues
  • 2005 Issues
  • 2006 Issues
  • 2007 Issues
  • 2008 Issues
  • 2009 Issues
  • 2010 Issues
  • 2011 Issues
  • 2012 Issues
  • 2013 Issues
  • 2014 Issues
  • 2015 Issues
  • 2016 Issues
  • 2017 Issues
  • 2018 Issues
  • 2019 Issues
  • 2024 Issues
  • Articles
  • December issue
  • December Release
  • June Issue
  • June Release
  • March Issue
  • March Issue
  • March Release
  • News
  • number / volume 2
  • number /volume 1
  • number /volume 1
  • number /volume 1 2008
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2 special Issue
  • number 2 special Issue 2
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number/ volume 3 2008
  • number/ volume 4 2008
  • number/volume 1
  • number/volume 1
  • number/volume 2
  • number/volume 2
  • number/volume 2 2008
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 4
  • number/volume1
  • September Issue
  • September Release
  • Special Edition
  • special Issue
  • Uncategorized
  • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
  • volume 1
  • volume 1
  • volume 1
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume1

Categories

  • 2001 Issues
  • 2002 Issues
  • 2003 Issues
  • 2004 Issues
  • 2005 Issues
  • 2006 Issues
  • 2007 Issues
  • 2008 Issues
  • 2009 Issues
  • 2010 Issues
  • 2011 Issues
  • 2012 Issues
  • 2013 Issues
  • 2014 Issues
  • 2015 Issues
  • 2016 Issues
  • 2017 Issues
  • 2018 Issues
  • 2019 Issues
  • 2024 Issues
  • Articles
  • December issue
  • December Release
  • June Issue
  • June Release
  • March Issue
  • March Issue
  • March Release
  • News
  • number / volume 2
  • number /volume 1
  • number /volume 1
  • number /volume 1 2008
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 1
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2
  • number 2 special Issue
  • number 2 special Issue 2
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 3
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number 4
  • number/ volume 3 2008
  • number/ volume 4 2008
  • number/volume 1
  • number/volume 1
  • number/volume 2
  • number/volume 2
  • number/volume 2 2008
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 3
  • number/volume 4
  • number/volume1
  • September Issue
  • September Release
  • Special Edition
  • special Issue
  • Uncategorized
  • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
  • volume 1
  • volume 1
  • volume 1
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 2
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 3
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume 4
  • volume1

Archives

  • April 2024
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017

Tags

Achives Latest News


ISSN 1680-6905

  • P. O. Box 7072 ,Kampala, Uganda
  • Call Us: 256(41)530021
  • info@africanhealthsciences.org

Latest Activities

Usefull Link

  • About AHS
  • Services
  • Focus & Scope
  • Our Articles
  • Contact Us

Subscribe

For research updates from African Health Sciences, sign up now!

[contact-form-7 id="1620" title="Subscribe"]

African Health Sciences © All Right Reserved