x
African Health Sciences

    Book Now

    • 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    African Health Sciences
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • Give Feedback
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Staff
    • Focus & Scope
    • For Authors
    • More Links
      • About The Journal
      • Latest Articles
      • Journal Archives
      • Our Events
      • Faq’s
    • Contact Us
    Logo

    Contact Info

    • P. O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda
    • +256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • ISSN 1680-6905
    • <!--
    • -->

    01Nov2017

    Global Assessment of functioning scale

    by admin,  0 Comments

    Effect of brief training on reliability and applicability of Global Assessment of functioning scale by Psychiatric clinical officers in Uganda

    C Abbo, ES Okello, J Nakku

    Abstract

    Background: The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is the standard method and an essential tool for representing a clinician’s judgment of a patient’s overall level of psychological, social and occupational functioning. As such, it is probably the single most widely used method for assessing impairment among the patients with psychiatric illnesses.

    Objective: To assess the effects of one-hour training on application of the GAF by Psychiatric Clinical Officers’ in a Ugandan setting.

    Method: Five Psychiatrists and five Psychiatric Clinical Officers (PCOs) or Assistant Medical Officers who hold a 2 year diploma in Clinical Psychiatry were randomly selected to independently rate a video-recorded psychiatric interview according to the DSM IV-TR. The PCOs were then offered a one-hour training on how to rate the GAF scale and asked to rate the video case interview again. All ratings were assigned on the basis of past one year, at admission and current functioning. Interclass correlations (ICC) were computed using two-way mixed models.

    Results: The ICC between the psychiatrists and the PCOs before training in the past one year, at admission and current functioning were +0.48, +0.51 and +0.59 respectively. After training, the ICC coefficients were +0.60, +0.82 and +0.83.

    Conclusion: Brief training given to PCOs improved the applications of their ratings of GAF scale to acceptable levels. There is need for formal training to this cadre of psychiatric practitioners in the use of the GAF.

     

    Full Text:

    Related posts:

    D-Dimer assay as a non invasive

    Roles of family dynamics

    Tardive hip disease diagnosis

    Recent Posts

    • Editor’s choice: Tackling infectious diseases, NCDs and sexual reproductivehealth issues as we enter our 24th year of remarkable growth
    • Preconception and contraceptive care for women living with HIV/AIDSattending antiretroviral treatment clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria
    • Effects of SNPs on TNF-α and IL-10 cytokine expression in TB and HIVpatients in the Capricorn district, Limpopo Province, South Africa
    • Prevalence of Schistosomiasis in a neglected community, South western Nigeria at two points in time, spaced three years apart
    • Review of Leishmaniasis in the Middle East and North Africa

    Recent Comments

    No comments to show.

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Tags

    Achives Latest News


    ISSN 1680-6905

    • P. O. Box 7072 ,Kampala, Uganda
    • Call Us: 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org

    Latest Activities

    Usefull Link

    • About AHS
    • Services
    • Focus & Scope
    • Our Articles
    • Contact Us

    Subscribe

    For research updates from African Health Sciences, sign up now!

      African Health Sciences © All Right Reserved