x
African Health Sciences

    Book Now

    • 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    African Health Sciences
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • Give Feedback
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Staff
    • Focus & Scope
    • For Authors
    • More Links
      • About The Journal
      • Latest Articles
      • Journal Archives
      • Our Events
      • Faq’s
    • Contact Us
    Logo

    Contact Info

    • P. O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda
    • +256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • ISSN 1680-6905
    • <!--
    • -->

    25Oct2017

    Comparison of Pulmonary TB DOTS clinic medication

    by admin,  0 Comments

    Comparison of Pulmonary TB DOTS clinic medication before and after the introduction of daily DOTS treatment and attitudes of treatment defaulters in the Western Division of the Gambia

    A Sanneh, J.I Pollock

    Abstract

    Background: Over a third of the world’s population is infected with the tuberculin bacteria. In 1993 WHO launched the DOTS-strategy to enhance treatment compliance. Despite Gambia’s adaption in 1985 it falls below WHO target of 85% cure rate. The defaulter rate was 14% in 2001, which reached 16% in the urban areas of the Western Division in 2003.

    Objectives: This study aimed to compare TB treatment and outcomes before and after the introduction of daily directly observed therapy (DOTS) medication and the perceptions/attitudes of defaulters in the Western Division of the Gambia.

    Methods: The study employed a mixed study design; a quantitative cross sectional study that reviewed the clinic records of pulmonary TB patients before and after the introduction of daily TB-DOTS medication and an in-depth interview of defaulters on the daily medication. The study was conducted at the Brikama TB-clinic in Gambia, located at the main hospital of Brikama serving all satellite villages. It registers on average 110/100 000 new smear-positive pulmonary TB-cases per annum. The quantitative arm compared clinic-based records of TB-DOTS medication before and after the introduction of daily medication. The qualitative arm explored the perceptions of daily medication defaulters.

    Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment outcomes of the two medication policies. However patients were less likely to have had three sputum tests reviewed in the daily medication period (22% v 72% Odds Ratio 6.2 (p <0.001). However, they reported that daily medication with its fixed-dose combination was more convenient.

    Conclusion: Patients’ full compliance with daily medication was hindered by socio-economic factors. The daily medication with its increased workload undermines the proper implementation of fundamental DOTS-elements, particularly follow up and sputum review.

    Key word: Tuberculosis, Medication policies, Gambia

     

    Related posts:

    In vitro susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to monodesethylamodiaquine, quinine, mefloquine and...

    Basically a house of experts

    Effect of Rumex steudelii methanolic root extract

    Recent Posts

    • Editor’s choice: Tackling infectious diseases, NCDs and sexual reproductivehealth issues as we enter our 24th year of remarkable growth
    • Preconception and contraceptive care for women living with HIV/AIDSattending antiretroviral treatment clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria
    • Effects of SNPs on TNF-α and IL-10 cytokine expression in TB and HIVpatients in the Capricorn district, Limpopo Province, South Africa
    • Prevalence of Schistosomiasis in a neglected community, South western Nigeria at two points in time, spaced three years apart
    • Review of Leishmaniasis in the Middle East and North Africa

    Recent Comments

    No comments to show.

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Tags

    Achives Latest News


    ISSN 1680-6905

    • P. O. Box 7072 ,Kampala, Uganda
    • Call Us: 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org

    Latest Activities

    Usefull Link

    • About AHS
    • Services
    • Focus & Scope
    • Our Articles
    • Contact Us

    Subscribe

    For research updates from African Health Sciences, sign up now!

      African Health Sciences © All Right Reserved