x
African Health Sciences

    Book Now

    • 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    African Health Sciences
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • Give Feedback
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Staff
    • Focus & Scope
    • For Authors
    • More Links
      • About The Journal
      • Latest Articles
      • Journal Archives
      • Our Events
      • Faq’s
    • Contact Us
    Logo

    Contact Info

    • P. O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda
    • +256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • ISSN 1680-6905
    • <!--
    • -->

    04Oct2017

    Gender preferences among antenatal women

    by admin,  0 Comments

    Gender preferences among antenatal women: a cross-sectional study from coastal South India

    N Kumar, T Kanchan, U Bhaskaran, T Rekha, P Mithra, V Kulkarni, R Holla, D Bhagwan, S Reddy

    Abstract

    Background: A balanced sex ratio is essential for a stable society.

    Objective: The main objective of the present research was to study the perceptions of women attending the antenatal care (ANC) facility regarding their gender preferences and family composition.

    Method: In this cross-sectional study 132 antenatal women were interviewed in their preferred language using a predesigned semi-structured questionnaire. The collected information was analyzed using SPSS version 11.5.

    Results: The mean age of the study participants was 27.2 ± 4.1 years. The majority of the antenatal women (60.6%, n=80) did not have any gender preferences. Among those who had a gender preference (39.4%, n=52), male and female preference was reported by 55.7% (n=29) and 44.3% (n=23) of the participants respectively. The overall son preference index was observed to be 1.3. No consistent relationship could be established between the socio-demographic factors and the preference for gender. The mean preferred family size in our study was 1.85±0.531 and more than half of the participants had a balanced gender preference. The majority of the participants were aware that the adverse sex ratio can lead to fall in the number of brides and that it would bring about a social imbalance.

    Conclusion: As a developed society we need to ensure that both the genders get equal respect and are free from any sort of preferences and prejudices. To achieve this, more and more people need to be made aware of the consequences of gender imbalance and adverse sex ratio in a society.

    Keywords: Gender preferences; family composition; antenatal women; coastal South India

     

    Related posts:

    Relation of maternal vitamin D status with gestational diabetes mellitus and perinatal outcome

    Seroprevalence of transfusion transmissible infections (TTI), in frst time blood donors in Abeokuta,...

    Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration

    Recent Posts

    • Editor’s choice: Tackling infectious diseases, NCDs and sexual reproductivehealth issues as we enter our 24th year of remarkable growth
    • Preconception and contraceptive care for women living with HIV/AIDSattending antiretroviral treatment clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria
    • Effects of SNPs on TNF-α and IL-10 cytokine expression in TB and HIVpatients in the Capricorn district, Limpopo Province, South Africa
    • Prevalence of Schistosomiasis in a neglected community, South western Nigeria at two points in time, spaced three years apart
    • Review of Leishmaniasis in the Middle East and North Africa

    Recent Comments

    No comments to show.

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Tags

    Achives Latest News


    ISSN 1680-6905

    • P. O. Box 7072 ,Kampala, Uganda
    • Call Us: 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org

    Latest Activities

    Usefull Link

    • About AHS
    • Services
    • Focus & Scope
    • Our Articles
    • Contact Us

    Subscribe

    For research updates from African Health Sciences, sign up now!

      African Health Sciences © All Right Reserved