x
African Health Sciences

    Book Now

    • 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    African Health Sciences
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • Give Feedback
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Staff
    • Focus & Scope
    • For Authors
    • More Links
      • About The Journal
      • Latest Articles
      • Journal Archives
      • Our Events
      • Faq’s
    • Contact Us
    Logo

    Contact Info

    • P. O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda
    • +256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org
    • ISSN 1680-6905
    • <!--
    • -->

    13Sep2017

    A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour in women with intra uterine fetal death in Mulago Hospital, Uganda

    by admin,  0 Comments

    A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour in women with intra uterine fetal death in Mulago Hospital, Uganda

    Dr. Nuru Nakintu
    Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology , Makerere University , P . O. Box 7072 Kampala, Uganda

    ABSTRACT
    Background
    Intrauterine fetal death is a major problem in obstetrics particularly in developing countries such as Uganda. Induction of labour in casesof fetal death using the available method of oxytocin is often difficult, expensive and frustrating.

    Objectives
    To compare the effectiveness of vaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin in induction of labour in women with intrauterine fetal death

    Methods
    One hundred and twenty mothers were allocated in a randomised controlled way to one of the two induction groups. Oxytocin infusion was titrated based on patient response. The starting dose was 50mcg (1/4 tablet) in misoprostol group and the dose was doubled every six hours till effective contractions were achieved. The two groups were compared for induction to delivery intervals, costs of the drugs and their safety during induction.

    Results
    The success rate within 48 hours of induction was 100% in the misoprostol group and 96.7% in oxytocin group. The mean induction to delivery time was significantly longer in the oxytocin group compared with the misoprostol group (23.3 versus 12.4 hours; p= 0.004). In the gestational age before 28 weeks, the induction to delivery interval in oxytocin group , was more than twice that used in misoprostol. However beyond 28 weeks, there was no significant difference. Women with intact membranes had induction to delivery interval of 27.9 hours in the oxytocin group and 14.7 hours in the misoprostol group (p=0.002). When the membranes were ruptured, the values were 10.5 and 8.5 hours respectively (p=0.6). The induction to delivery time in cases with Bishop’s score < 6 was 29.8hours in the oxytocin group and 15.9 hours in misoprostol group (p=0.001). The corresponding values for Bishop’s scores > 6 were 10 and 7.9 hours respectively (p=0.6). The majority of patients in misoprostol group (62%), required less than one tablet for successful induction. Misoprostol was cheaper (0.65 USD than oxytocin (7.86 USD) Retained placenta occurred in only 3.3% of the patients in the misoprostol group . There were no cases of ruptured uterus in both groups.

    Conclusion
    Intravaginal misoprostol is more effective and cheaper than intravenous oxytocin for inducing labour in patients with intrauterine fetal death.

    Related posts:

    Antibacterial and antifungal activities of extracts of Zanthoxylum chalybeum and Warburgia ugandensi...

    Contraceptive security , information flow , and local adaptations: Family planning Morocco.

    Rapid detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from cattle and zoo animals by Neste...

    Recent Posts

    • Editor’s choice: Tackling infectious diseases, NCDs and sexual reproductivehealth issues as we enter our 24th year of remarkable growth
    • Preconception and contraceptive care for women living with HIV/AIDSattending antiretroviral treatment clinics in Lagos State, Nigeria
    • Effects of SNPs on TNF-α and IL-10 cytokine expression in TB and HIVpatients in the Capricorn district, Limpopo Province, South Africa
    • Prevalence of Schistosomiasis in a neglected community, South western Nigeria at two points in time, spaced three years apart
    • Review of Leishmaniasis in the Middle East and North Africa

    Recent Comments

    No comments to show.

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Categories

    • 2001 Issues
    • 2002 Issues
    • 2003 Issues
    • 2004 Issues
    • 2005 Issues
    • 2006 Issues
    • 2007 Issues
    • 2008 Issues
    • 2009 Issues
    • 2010 Issues
    • 2011 Issues
    • 2012 Issues
    • 2013 Issues
    • 2014 Issues
    • 2015 Issues
    • 2016 Issues
    • 2017 Issues
    • 2018 Issues
    • 2019 Issues
    • 2024 Issues
    • Articles
    • December issue
    • December Release
    • June Issue
    • June Release
    • March Issue
    • March Issue
    • March Release
    • News
    • number / volume 2
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1
    • number /volume 1 2008
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 1
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2
    • number 2 special Issue
    • number 2 special Issue 2
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 3
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number 4
    • number/ volume 3 2008
    • number/ volume 4 2008
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 1
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2
    • number/volume 2 2008
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 3
    • number/volume 4
    • number/volume1
    • September Issue
    • September Release
    • Special Edition
    • special Issue
    • Uncategorized
    • Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 1
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 2
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 3
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume 4
    • volume1

    Archives

    • April 2024
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017

    Tags

    Achives Latest News


    ISSN 1680-6905

    • P. O. Box 7072 ,Kampala, Uganda
    • Call Us: 256(41)530021
    • info@africanhealthsciences.org

    Latest Activities

    Usefull Link

    • About AHS
    • Services
    • Focus & Scope
    • Our Articles
    • Contact Us

    Subscribe

    For research updates from African Health Sciences, sign up now!

      African Health Sciences © All Right Reserved